It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
Geology: Evaluate Sources
The study of the earth: its origin, history, structure, composition, and the natural processes acting on it. geochronology, stratigraphy, and palaeontology); physical (including geomorphology, geophysics,
Your instructor has asked you to write a paper based on current scholarly information. What would be the most appropriate source to use?
Journals: 12 votes (57.14%)
Newspapers: 5 votes (23.81%)
Magazines: 0 votes (0%)
Books: 4 votes (19.05%)
Total Votes: 21
Are your sources credible and useful, or are they a bunch of . . .?!
The CRAAP Test is a list of questions that help you determine if the sources you found are accurate and reliable. Keep in mind that the following list is not static or complete. Different criteria will be more or less important depending on your situation or need.
Key: * indicates criteria is for Web sources only
Currency: The timeliness of the information.
When was the information published or posted?
Has the information been revised or updated?
Is the information current or out-of date for your topic?
Are the links functional? *
Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs.
Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question?
Who is the intended audience?
Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)?
Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use?
Would you be comfortable using this source for a research paper?
Authority: The source of the information.
Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor?
Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given?
What are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given?
What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic?
Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address?
Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source? examples: .com .edu .gov .org .net *
Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.
Where does the information come from?
Is the information supported by evidence?
Has the information been reviewed or refereed?
Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge?
Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion?
Are there spelling, grammar, or other typographical errors?
Purpose: The reason the information exists.
What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade?
Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear?
Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda?Does the point of view appear objective and impartial?
Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
This is a modified version of a document created by Sarah Blakeslee at Meriam Library, CSU Chico.