Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Dental Programs: Dental Web Resources

Considerations When Using Health Information on the Public Internet

View Evaluating Health information: A Tutorial from the National Library of Medicine

Read Find Good Health Information  from the Medical Library Association for a few ideas for filtering the available web pages to a manageable number:

Purpose: Why was the page created? To: Inform, entertain, advertise, influence, advocate, provide up-to-the-moment news?  Health professionals must identify the best information to make accurate health decisions. Be particularly wary of websites that are trying to sell you their medical product.  Medical marketers will post research supporting their product, but won’t post research that doesn’t support it.

Internet Medicine

Authority/author: Who is responsible for the page? Is the author an expert in this field? What else has he/she written or produced? Does the author provide an e-mail address? How accurate is the provided information? Can you find any information that substantiates the person’s level of expertise?

Sponsor/Owner: On what type of Internet provider or domain does the page reside?  Government agency (.gov, .mil, .us);  Educational (.edu); Business/Company (.com, .biz ); Association: Professional or Non Profit (.org).  Does it matter?

What is it? Web-only page; magazine news or journal article; government source, blog, etc. Be particularly careful with information in listservs, blogs, and wikis – especially if you cannot verify it in standard respected information sources.

Audience: To what type of reader is the Web page directed? Is this written for medical professionals, or, for consumer health information seekers?

Coverage: Does the page cover the topic comprehensively, partially or is it an overview? Are the graphics clear in intent, relevant and professional looking?

Design and Content: Is the page organized and focused? Is it well designed? Is the text well written? Are the links relevant, appropriate and up-to-date? How’s the spelling?

Bias: Is a bias in the author’s or sponsor’s work  evident? Is it stated, or implied?  Medical products and pharrmaceautical and health-related companies will be biased toward their own brands.

Date of Production/Revision: When was the Web page produced? When was it last revised? Are all the links still viable?

Security:  Are security and/or encryption systems employed when necessary?

Dental Web Resources

Be especially careful when selecting resources from the public internet, as many dental sites are owned by dental products manufacturers. Pay close attention to the [About Us] sections of the websites you choose. 

x-ray of 32 teetch

Wikimedia: Ruhrfisch (talk) Panoramic X-ray of all 32 teeth of a male in his 40s with no cavities or fillings or other dental work.

Dental professional leans over patient

Evidence-Based Dentistry (EBD)

There are many versions of Evidence Based Practice Pyramids. TRIP's (top graphic) is probably the best-known. The ADA places their own Clinical Practice Guidelines at the very top of the pyramid.  (bottom graphic)

EBM Pyramid